The one issue candidate

The man, is insane. He has a single issue. He is obsessed with it night and day. He can only think about terrorists.

When posed with a question about the economy…..

I present to you Rudy “9/11″ Giuliani:

An Open Letter to MSNBC

To Whom It May Concern,

I am writing to you today to voice my displeasure and regret at what has happened to the NBC News organization. For the past thirty-one years, I have considered myself a loyal NBC viewer — of both your news and entertainment programs. I have always considered them to be of a higher quality than other television offerings. I grew up watching Tom Brokaw on the Nightly News and have always viewed him and the rest of the NBC News organization as some of the most professional journalists in the world. Last night, though, my entire view of your organization was turned on its head and will forever be tarnished. I am speaking, of course, of the decision to exclude Dennis Kucinich from the Nevada Democratic debate on January 15th, 2008 immediately followed by the miserable debate moderation by Brian Williams and Tim Russert.

By excluding Congressman Kucinich from the debate last night, NBC has chosen who our Democratic candidates are. Mr. Kucinich has had a long and distinguished political career that spans nearly my entire life. For nearly thirty years he has had a consistent message regarding his vision for making our country great, and therefore as a presidential candidate he deserves to have his message heard as part of the greater discourse on how the next four years of government will be ran. By excluding the congressman from the debate you are implicitly responsible for making his candidacy unfeasible — which is obviously the exact reason you chose to exclude him. As a news organization, you enjoy ultimate protections under the First Amendment. But, with those protections comes a responsibility: to provide due diligence to your viewers and readers and to provide them with all the relevant information available on a subject. Excluding a candidate — who is still on the ballot –from a debate does a disservice to the American population and tarnishes your reputation as an honest and reputable source of information.

Perhaps your news editors will rethink their decision of excluding Mr. Kucinich once they review the performances of Mr. Williams and Mr. Russert as debate moderators. For over twenty minutes, we as viewers were forced to watch two distinguished journalists attempt to start a petty squabble between Senators Obama and Clinton over the issues of race — a topic that prior to the debate they had clearly stated was no longer open for conversation. Instead, Mr. Williams and Mr. Russert attempted to goad the candidates into a personal attack on one another, instead of asking substantive questions regarding, i.e.: the economy, the war, health care, corporate intrusion in the election process, the environment, eduction, President Bush’s legacy, America’s moral standing in the world, and a host of other topics.

The senseless barrage of questioning was only ended when a heckler from the audience clearly voiced to all your viewers his displeasure, and called for an end to the line of questioning. The priceless “deer-in-the-headlights” look on Tim Russert’s face at that moment seemed to say to me that he had a number of follow-up questions regarding race and, quite possibly, a number of gender-related ones to keep us going through the first hour. I for one was pleased to see the questioning end and move on to the topics which our next president will actually be faced with.

Why were the news editors afraid to include Mr. Kucinich? Were they afraid that they would be interviewing three candidates who sound the same on all of the issues, only to be left with one candidate who would not only offer up a contrary point of view to the issues, but also be able to back it up by a voting record that he shows no regret for, unlike the others sharing the stage? By including him, maybe the debate last night would have been much more helpful to us in choosing a Democratic nominee. Instead, last night’s debate only served to help mesh Senators Clinton, Edwards, and Obamas’ messages together, into an amalgamation with no distinguishable differences between the three. Instead of choosing a presidential nominee and their message, we are left to only choose the face of our presidential nominee, and do we want it to be white or black, male or female? That choice is as exciting as choosing to have fries or onion rings at a fast food restaurant.

I feel that NBC News has lowered the standards of its journalism and interjected its corporate preferences into our election process — something no respectable journalism organization should ever do. You have lost my respect as a news organization and only significant amends to your journalistic practices will prove that your organization takes its role in society seriously.

Sent to letters@msnbc.com and info@kucinich.us. Thanks to Meggi for the editing and cleanup help.

This space left blank for solidarity

The polls were wrong????

No, the polls were exactly right. Obama was going to get 37% of the vote, Hilary was going to get 30% of the vote, and 30% of the voters were undecided. Polling is a time honored, time tested method of predicting the future.

Wait now predicting the future? Yes predicting the future. Statistical analysis allows for a small sample to be taken and then information extrapolated from that. One of the foundations of science is statistical analysis because it is simply physically impossible to look at every single thing in the universe.

So what happened Tuesday night? Quite simple, the people of New Hampshire spoke, they didn’t know what they were going to do till the morning they went in to the polls.

The pundits decided for them.

*I find it funny that the Google ad is an anti Obama add ;)

The politics of change

It is about 30 minutes away from when I expect the New Hampshire primary results to be announced. By now we are all fairly certain that Barack Obama is going to win the primary for the Democrats. The question is why….

It all has to do with exactly what he is talking about…change.

The American people are longing for real change in this country. We have two candidates who are siding on the voices of change and one who is voicing on the side of the establishment. Obama and Edwards are quickly morphing in to the same candidate so why is Obama getting so many more votes than Edwards is? I’m going to say it, it’s because he is black.

After years of not being listened to the American voting public is tired of being ignored. They are sending the message to not only the current president but to the rest of the world can’t ignore. We are ready for a change. Yes we could vote for the white guy with the same message, but hey, it’s just another white guy as the President of the United States. So instead we are going to pick the black guy because hey, we’ve never done that before…..

We want change….we are hungry for change…..

I will be voting for Dennis Kucinich because here in Michigan only Clinton, Kucinich, and Dodd are on the ballot (have to love primary politics) and well, with Dodd out….guess I need to go with who’s left :)

Go register, go vote…you don’t vote, you can’t complain.