California should ban marriage all together

Today is a sad day in my home state of California.  On the same night that our nation proved we could move past hundreds of years of racism by electing Barack Obama president, California took one giant step backwards in to the bigotry corner.  With the passage of California Proposition 8 , the state’s population took a look at one whole segment of the population and said “You aren’t good enough.”

The residents of California, where many of my friends and much of my family still lives, should be ashamed.   The ability of people to vote out of fear and hatred to forcibly remove rights from people is simply unthinkable.  If the “family values” group is really determined to “protect marriage” then they need to outlaw divorce, or better yet, marriage all together.  To protect something completely, eliminate it completely.

Which is why I am proposing the following.  I will donate $50 to any and all of the following ballot proposals in the state of California.  Since the passage of proposition 8 is a clear violation of equal protection statues, then that means the rest of the bill of rights and societal norms are up for grabs now.  So, let’s get to mending:

  • Ban on marriage outright.  We all know that 100% of divorces are caused by marriage.  Eliminate marriage then the divorce problem in this nation is solved.
  • Tax exempt status for churches removed.  The first amendment to the US constitution expressly forbids a state sponsored religion.  Yet a tax exempt status for religious groups is obviously sponsoring them.  In addition, religious groups that have chosen to interject their beliefs in to secular society need to have their tax exempt status removed.
  • 100% complete ban on guns.  Since the passage of proposition 8 has made the Fourteenth Amendment null and void, I am proposing we make the Second Amendment null and void to.  (For those of you who don’t remember high school civics, the 14th amendment is the equal protection clause, the one that ironically lead to Obama getting elected last night).
  • Reversal of proposition 8.  Nuf said.
  • Forced sterilization of all heterosexuals.  (Now I’m just on a roll).
The rules for getting a proposition on the ballot in California is drop dead easy.  For $200 and between 440,000 and 700,000 signatures you too can have your very own ballot initiative.  With a state population of nearly 36.5 million people that works out to needing only 1.9% of the population signing your petition.  This gets to the root problem of the initiative process in California.  But that’s a different rant.
So this is just my short list of new ballot proposals for the “great” state of California.
Feel free to add to this list as you see fit.
A great injustice was done.  It needs to be righted.

Obama wins

Barack Obama has won the election.  18 months in the making, and we are now finally over with the two-thousand and eight election cycle.  Only 45 more days till the two-thousand and twelve election cycle starts.

Barack I congratulate you on your victory and give you permission to sleep in tomorrow.  But the day after I fully expect you to make good on the promises and hope that you’ve inspired in to this country.

We have changed.  We are moving forward.

I am happy.

10 Trillion in debt, and rising

To anyone who reads this and is convinced that the republicans have your best economic interests at heart I would like to direct your attention to this little chart over at Z-facts. On Septbember 30th the national debt crossed the $10 Trillion mark. It is rising even faster.

Fact: The economy is in the tank.
Fact: The country is up to it’s collective eyeballs in debt
Fact: Wall-Street never needed $700 Billion of our money. The Paulson plan was to scare us in to believing it was a good idea.

Do yourself a favor, do not vote against your best interests simply for stances on a few social issues that have zero impact on your life.

Fact: Gays have been able to legally marry in California since June, the world did not end.
Fact: The National debt is larger than the age of the universe.
Fact: To eliminate the debt taxes will have to increase. Suck it up, pay it, quit your bitching.

Vote for change.

The changing tide?

According to Electoral-Vote.com the states of Florida, Virginia, and Ohio have all switched from weak Republican to a dead heat. This is good. This is very good.

Letter to my congressman

Mr. Knollenberg, I am deeply troubled by the proposed bail out plan in front of congress. First I do not believe that such a bail out is warranted and secondly I do not believe that there has been enough time for our leaders and the public to debate the merits of such a plan. I feel that the American people are being held hostage by the financial sector that has made poor business decisions and are desperately looking for a way out of their situation. Every investor knows that there is no guarantee on an investment, and that an FDIC insured bank account is the only sure fire way to avoid losing money on an investment. I believe that the American economy is going to suffer a great blow no matter the outcome of this bail out package. This bail out pack includes zero provisions to prevent the situation we are in from happening again. This bail out in my view point is simply an attempt for the Wall Street investors to make a “run on the bank” before the American people have a chance to ask why. I urge you to please vote against this resolution.

Something smells fishy…..

Ever wonder why Eliot Spitzer seemed to be taken down so quickly while others such as David Vitter and Larry Craig seem to go unhindered? Well according to Greg Palast you simply need to follow the money.

Vote for McCain

To my supporters

Though I have yet to receive a single vote in this year’s primary season I vow to continue on till election day in November.

An Open Letter to MSNBC

To Whom It May Concern,

I am writing to you today to voice my displeasure and regret at what has happened to the NBC News organization. For the past thirty-one years, I have considered myself a loyal NBC viewer — of both your news and entertainment programs. I have always considered them to be of a higher quality than other television offerings. I grew up watching Tom Brokaw on the Nightly News and have always viewed him and the rest of the NBC News organization as some of the most professional journalists in the world. Last night, though, my entire view of your organization was turned on its head and will forever be tarnished. I am speaking, of course, of the decision to exclude Dennis Kucinich from the Nevada Democratic debate on January 15th, 2008 immediately followed by the miserable debate moderation by Brian Williams and Tim Russert.

By excluding Congressman Kucinich from the debate last night, NBC has chosen who our Democratic candidates are. Mr. Kucinich has had a long and distinguished political career that spans nearly my entire life. For nearly thirty years he has had a consistent message regarding his vision for making our country great, and therefore as a presidential candidate he deserves to have his message heard as part of the greater discourse on how the next four years of government will be ran. By excluding the congressman from the debate you are implicitly responsible for making his candidacy unfeasible — which is obviously the exact reason you chose to exclude him. As a news organization, you enjoy ultimate protections under the First Amendment. But, with those protections comes a responsibility: to provide due diligence to your viewers and readers and to provide them with all the relevant information available on a subject. Excluding a candidate — who is still on the ballot –from a debate does a disservice to the American population and tarnishes your reputation as an honest and reputable source of information.

Perhaps your news editors will rethink their decision of excluding Mr. Kucinich once they review the performances of Mr. Williams and Mr. Russert as debate moderators. For over twenty minutes, we as viewers were forced to watch two distinguished journalists attempt to start a petty squabble between Senators Obama and Clinton over the issues of race — a topic that prior to the debate they had clearly stated was no longer open for conversation. Instead, Mr. Williams and Mr. Russert attempted to goad the candidates into a personal attack on one another, instead of asking substantive questions regarding, i.e.: the economy, the war, health care, corporate intrusion in the election process, the environment, eduction, President Bush’s legacy, America’s moral standing in the world, and a host of other topics.

The senseless barrage of questioning was only ended when a heckler from the audience clearly voiced to all your viewers his displeasure, and called for an end to the line of questioning. The priceless “deer-in-the-headlights” look on Tim Russert’s face at that moment seemed to say to me that he had a number of follow-up questions regarding race and, quite possibly, a number of gender-related ones to keep us going through the first hour. I for one was pleased to see the questioning end and move on to the topics which our next president will actually be faced with.

Why were the news editors afraid to include Mr. Kucinich? Were they afraid that they would be interviewing three candidates who sound the same on all of the issues, only to be left with one candidate who would not only offer up a contrary point of view to the issues, but also be able to back it up by a voting record that he shows no regret for, unlike the others sharing the stage? By including him, maybe the debate last night would have been much more helpful to us in choosing a Democratic nominee. Instead, last night’s debate only served to help mesh Senators Clinton, Edwards, and Obamas’ messages together, into an amalgamation with no distinguishable differences between the three. Instead of choosing a presidential nominee and their message, we are left to only choose the face of our presidential nominee, and do we want it to be white or black, male or female? That choice is as exciting as choosing to have fries or onion rings at a fast food restaurant.

I feel that NBC News has lowered the standards of its journalism and interjected its corporate preferences into our election process — something no respectable journalism organization should ever do. You have lost my respect as a news organization and only significant amends to your journalistic practices will prove that your organization takes its role in society seriously.

Sent to letters@msnbc.com and info@kucinich.us. Thanks to Meggi for the editing and cleanup help.

The polls were wrong????

No, the polls were exactly right. Obama was going to get 37% of the vote, Hilary was going to get 30% of the vote, and 30% of the voters were undecided. Polling is a time honored, time tested method of predicting the future.

Wait now predicting the future? Yes predicting the future. Statistical analysis allows for a small sample to be taken and then information extrapolated from that. One of the foundations of science is statistical analysis because it is simply physically impossible to look at every single thing in the universe.

So what happened Tuesday night? Quite simple, the people of New Hampshire spoke, they didn’t know what they were going to do till the morning they went in to the polls.

The pundits decided for them.

*I find it funny that the Google ad is an anti Obama add ;)